CONSERVATION:
This species was originally classified under CITES Appendix I, where it remains to this day (except for a limited downgrading to Appendix II for the Congo population in the late 1980s). However, most reports indicate that the species is in no immediate danger throughout most of its range because it is widely distributed in several countries, some of which have high numbers of crocodiles. In one or two areas (particularly Gambia and Liberia), the local population is thought to be severely depleted and in danger of local extirpation.
The main problem with this species is still lack of reliable and widespread survey data. Without such information, the overall status of the species cannot be determined, and thus the CITES Appendix I classification will remain. Although the Crocodile Specialist Group lists the species as LOW RISK (under the IUCN classifications) because of its distribution and healthy population sizes in some areas, the IUCN Red Data List for 1996 gives a category of VULNERABLE to reflect the uncertainly of its status in the wild. Lack of survey data are due to the difficulty in accessing available habitat. The implementation of national parks has been slow in western Africa, and the skin of Osteolaemus has little value - and therefore the incentives for management and thus monitoring are low.
The skin of this species is considered to be very poor quality, and therefore management programs based around this are unlikely to be viable. In areas where the species is used by local people, the skin is used for low-grade products. Meat through subsistence hunting is the main reason this species is taken in the wild, and although some reports indicate that this is likely to have an impact in some areas (e.g. Congo), habitat destruction is a far bigger threat to a species which otherwise has little value to the people who control what happens to the forest. An increasing local awareness is necessary for the future of Osteolaemus where it is threatened in the wild.
MORE INFORMATION:
For more information on distribution and conservation issues for this species,see the CSG Action Plan resource.
SIGNIFICANT REFERENCES:
Inger, RF (1948). The systematic status of the crocodile Osteoblepharon osborni. Copeia 1948: 15-19
Kofron, P & Steiner, C (1994). Observations on the African dwarf crocodile, Osteolaemus tetraspis. Copeia 1994(2): 533-535
Schmidt, KP (1919). Contributions to the herpetology of the Belgian Congo based on the collection of the American Museum Congo Expedition, 1909-1915. Part I. Turtles, crocodiles, lizards and chameleons. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist. 39: 385-624
Villiers, A (1956). Un crocodile nouveau pour le Sénégal, Osteolaemus tetraspis. Notes Afrique 70: 80-81
Waitkuwait, WE (1989). Present knowledge on the west African slender-snouted crocodile, Crocodylus cataphractus Cuvier 1824, and the west African dwarf crocodile, Osteolaemus tetraspis Cope 1861. In: Crocodiles. Their Ecology, Management and Conservation. A Special Publication of the IUCN/SSC Crocodile Specialist Group. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. pp.259-275